Death by overuse: Let’s refrain from using the term ‘reform’ for every policy change that’s announced
## Overusing the Term "Reform" Dilutes Its Meaning The habitual labeling of every new policy as a “reform” threatens to erode the word’s significance. For example, actions like the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) or labor code changes have often been called reforms, regardless of their scope or impact. ## The Consequences of Excessive Labeling When every change is branded as a reform, the public’s perception shifts, possibly leading to skepticism about genuine reforms. The dilution can lead to confusion about which policies truly represent substantial improvement and which are merely routine adjustments. > “Calling every policy adjustment a 'reform' risks stripping the word of meaning,” highlighting the need for careful use of terminology to maintain its value. ## Distinguishing True Reforms from Routine Policy Changes True reforms should bring about meaningful, systemic improvements rather than incremental or cosmetic tweaks. Recognizing this difference helps maintain clarity in public discourse and sets realistic expectations for policy outcomes. ## Author’s Reflection Overusing “reform” for any policy shift devalues the term and blurs distinctions between transformative change and standard governance adjustments.

more

Mint Mint — 2025-11-30